Interesting how these academics that disparage this pedagogy for lack of factual accuracy or its bias in favor of a Eurocentric epistemology rank among a profession that downplays the importance of factual accuracy or even the existence of eternal verities when it comes to advancing their own preferred agendas.
Secularist historians have for decades insisted it is not their place to make moral judgements.
As such, who are they to dictate as to how those outside of this profession that analyzes the past teach virtue —- something more the domain philosophers and theologians —- to the youth under the guidance of parents and educators deciding upon this instructional approach?